Chevrolet Aveo 2003 vs Mazda 2 2008
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.4 Petrol | 1.5 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 83 HP | 103 HP | |
| Torque: | 123 NM | 137 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.1 seconds | 10.4 seconds | |
|
Mazda 2 is a more dynamic driving. Chevrolet Aveo engine produces 20 HP less power than Mazda 2, whereas torque is 14 NM less than Mazda 2. Due to the lower power, Chevrolet Aveo reaches 100 km/h speed 1.7 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.6 | 5.9 | |
|
The Mazda 2 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Chevrolet Aveo consumes 1.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 2, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chevrolet Aveo could require 255 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 43 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 590 km in combined cycle | 720 km in combined cycle | |
| 730 km on highway | 870 km on highway | ||
| Mazda 2 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.88 m | 3.90 m | |
| Width: | 1.67 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.49 m | 1.48 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Chevrolet Aveo is 2 cm shorter than the Mazda 2, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Chevrolet Aveo is 1 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 175 litres | 250 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
980 litres | no data | |
|
Mazda 2 has more luggage space. Chevrolet Aveo has 75 litres less trunk space than the Mazda 2. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.8 meters | 9.8 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`535 | 1`485 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | high | |
| Mazda 2 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Chevrolet Aveo has serious deffects in 100 percent more cases than Mazda 2, so Mazda 2 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 1200 | 2400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Aveo has
|
Mazda 2 has
| |