Chevrolet Aveo 2003 vs Volkswagen Polo 2001

 
Chevrolet Aveo
2003 - 2008
Volkswagen Polo
2001 - 2005
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.1 Petrol1.4 Diesel
Petrol engines (Chevrolet Aveo) are generally quieter, smoother, and better suited for short trips due to quicker warm-up times. Diesel (Volkswagen Polo) engines, on the other hand, offer superior fuel efficiency and torque, making them ideal for long-distance driving and heavy loads. Read more: Petrol vs. Diesel: Fuel Economy and Key Differences.

Performance

Power: 72 HP75 HP
Torque: 104 NM195 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 13.7 seconds13.6 seconds
Chevrolet Aveo engine produces 3 HP less power than Volkswagen Polo, whereas torque is 91 NM less than Volkswagen Polo. Due to the lower power, Chevrolet Aveo reaches 100 km/h speed 0.1 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 6.64.5
Real fuel consumption: 7.0 l/100km5.2 l/100km
The Volkswagen Polo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Chevrolet Aveo consumes 2.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Polo, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chevrolet Aveo could require 315 litres more fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Chevrolet Aveo consumes 1.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Polo.
Fuel tank capacity: 45 litres45 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 680 km in combined cycle1000 km in combined cycle
810 km on highway1120 km on highway
640 km with real consumption860 km with real consumption
Volkswagen Polo gets more mileage on one fuel tank.
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Dimensions

Length: 3.88 m3.90 m
Width: 1.67 m1.65 m
Height: 1.49 m1.46 m
Both cars are similar in size. Chevrolet Aveo is 2 cm shorter than the Volkswagen Polo, 2 cm wider, while the height of Chevrolet Aveo is 3 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 175 litres245 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
980 litres975 litres
Chevrolet Aveo has 70 litres less trunk space than the Volkswagen Polo. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Chevrolet Aveo (by 5 litres).
Turning diameter: 9.8 meters10.6 meters
The turning circle of the Chevrolet Aveo is 0.8 metres less than that of the Volkswagen Polo, which means Chevrolet Aveo can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 1`4451`550
Safety:
Quality:
below average

average
Average price (€): 12001400
Pros and Cons: Chevrolet Aveo has
  • better manoeuvrability
  • lower price
Volkswagen Polo has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • roomier boot
  • higher safety
  • fewer faults
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv