Chevrolet Aveo 2003 vs Volkswagen Polo 2005
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.1 Petrol | 1.2 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 72 HP | 55 HP | |
| Torque: | 104 NM | 108 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.7 seconds | 17.5 seconds | |
|
Chevrolet Aveo is more dynamic to drive. Chevrolet Aveo engine produces 17 HP more power than Volkswagen Polo, but torque is 4 NM less than Volkswagen Polo. Thanks to more power Chevrolet Aveo reaches 100 km/h speed 3.8 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.6 | 5.8 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.0 l/100km | 7.0 l/100km | |
|
The Volkswagen Polo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Chevrolet Aveo consumes 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Polo, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chevrolet Aveo could require 120 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 45 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 680 km in combined cycle | 770 km in combined cycle | |
| 640 km with real consumption | 640 km with real consumption | ||
| Volkswagen Polo gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.88 m | 3.92 m | |
| Width: | 1.67 m | 1.65 m | |
| Height: | 1.49 m | 1.47 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Chevrolet Aveo is 4 cm shorter than the Volkswagen Polo, 2 cm wider, while the height of Chevrolet Aveo is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 175 litres | 270 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
980 litres | 1030 litres | |
|
Volkswagen Polo has more luggage space. Chevrolet Aveo has 95 litres less trunk space than the Volkswagen Polo. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volkswagen Polo (by 50 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.8 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chevrolet Aveo is 0.8 metres less than that of the Volkswagen Polo, which means Chevrolet Aveo can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`445 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | below average | |
| Volkswagen Polo has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Chevrolet Aveo has serious deffects in 45 percent more cases than Volkswagen Polo, so Volkswagen Polo quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 1200 | 2200 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 7.3/10 | 8.0/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Aveo has
|
Volkswagen Polo has
| |