Chevrolet Aveo 2003 vs Suzuki Splash 2008
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.1 Petrol | 1.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 72 HP | 65 HP | |
| Torque: | 104 NM | 90 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.7 seconds | 14.7 seconds | |
|
Chevrolet Aveo is more dynamic to drive. Chevrolet Aveo engine produces 7 HP more power than Suzuki Splash, whereas torque is 14 NM more than Suzuki Splash. Thanks to more power Chevrolet Aveo reaches 100 km/h speed 1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.6 | 5.0 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.0 l/100km | 6.0 l/100km | |
|
The Suzuki Splash is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Chevrolet Aveo consumes 1.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Suzuki Splash, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chevrolet Aveo could require 240 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Chevrolet Aveo consumes 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Suzuki Splash. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 45 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 680 km in combined cycle | 900 km in combined cycle | |
| 810 km on highway | 1020 km on highway | ||
| 640 km with real consumption | 750 km with real consumption | ||
| Suzuki Splash gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 9 years | 12 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Chevrolet Kalos | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Opel Agila, Suzuki Alto | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Suzuki Splash might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.88 m | 3.72 m | |
| Width: | 1.67 m | 1.68 m | |
| Height: | 1.49 m | 1.59 m | |
| Chevrolet Aveo is 17 cm longer than the Suzuki Splash, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Chevrolet Aveo is 10 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 175 litres | 178 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
980 litres | 1050 litres | |
| Chevrolet Aveo has 3 litres less trunk space than the Suzuki Splash. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Suzuki Splash (by 70 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.8 meters | 9.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chevrolet Aveo is 0.4 metres more than that of the Suzuki Splash, which means Chevrolet Aveo can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`445 | 1`485 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | below average | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 1200 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Aveo has
|
Suzuki Splash has
| |