Chevrolet Aveo 2003 vs Mitsubishi Colt 1996
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.1 Petrol | 1.3 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 72 HP | 75 HP | |
| Torque: | 104 NM | 108 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.7 seconds | 12.5 seconds | |
|
Mitsubishi Colt is a more dynamic driving. Chevrolet Aveo engine produces 3 HP less power than Mitsubishi Colt, whereas torque is 4 NM less than Mitsubishi Colt. Due to the lower power, Chevrolet Aveo reaches 100 km/h speed 1.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.6 | 6.9 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.9 l/100km | 7.1 l/100km | |
|
By specification Chevrolet Aveo consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Colt, which means that by driving the Chevrolet Aveo over 15,000 km in a year you can save 45 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Chevrolet Aveo consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Colt. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 680 km in combined cycle | 720 km in combined cycle | |
| 810 km on highway | 900 km on highway | ||
| 650 km with real consumption | 700 km with real consumption | ||
| Mitsubishi Colt gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 9 years | 27 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Chevrolet Kalos | Used also on Mitsubishi Lancer | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mitsubishi Colt might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.88 m | 3.88 m | |
| Width: | 1.67 m | 1.68 m | |
| Height: | 1.49 m | 1.36 m | |
| Chevrolet Aveo and Mitsubishi Colt are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 175 litres | 240 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
980 litres | 830 litres | |
| Chevrolet Aveo has 65 litres less trunk space than the Mitsubishi Colt. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Chevrolet Aveo (by 150 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.8 meters | 10 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chevrolet Aveo is 0.2 metres less than that of the Mitsubishi Colt. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`445 | 1`445 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | Chevrolet Aveo has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Mitsubishi Colt, so Chevrolet Aveo quality could be a bit better. | ||
| Average price (€): | 1200 | 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Mitsubishi Colt has
| |