Chevrolet Aveo 2003 vs Mitsubishi Colt 2004
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.1 Petrol | 1.3 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 72 HP | 95 HP | |
| Torque: | 104 NM | 125 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.7 seconds | 11.1 seconds | |
|
Mitsubishi Colt is a more dynamic driving. Chevrolet Aveo engine produces 23 HP less power than Mitsubishi Colt, whereas torque is 21 NM less than Mitsubishi Colt. Due to the lower power, Chevrolet Aveo reaches 100 km/h speed 2.6 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.6 | 5.8 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.9 l/100km | 6.5 l/100km | |
|
The Mitsubishi Colt is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Chevrolet Aveo consumes 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Colt, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chevrolet Aveo could require 120 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Chevrolet Aveo consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Colt. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 47 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 680 km in combined cycle | 810 km in combined cycle | |
| 810 km on highway | 970 km on highway | ||
| 650 km with real consumption | 720 km with real consumption | ||
| Mitsubishi Colt gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 9 years | 20 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Chevrolet Kalos | Used also on Smart ForFour | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mitsubishi Colt might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.88 m | 3.87 m | |
| Width: | 1.67 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.49 m | 1.55 m | |
| Chevrolet Aveo is 1 cm longer than the Mitsubishi Colt, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Chevrolet Aveo is 6 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 175 litres | 155 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
980 litres | 760 litres | |
| Chevrolet Aveo has 20 litres more trunk space than the Mitsubishi Colt. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Chevrolet Aveo (by 220 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.8 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chevrolet Aveo is 1 metres less than that of the Mitsubishi Colt, which means Chevrolet Aveo can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`445 | 1`435 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | above average | |
| Mitsubishi Colt has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Chevrolet Aveo has serious deffects in 75 percent more cases than Mitsubishi Colt, so Mitsubishi Colt quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 800 | 1600 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 7.3/10 | 8.2/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Aveo has
|
Mitsubishi Colt has
| |