Chevrolet Aveo 2003 vs Chevrolet Kalos 2005
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.1 Petrol | 1.4 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 72 HP | 94 HP | |
| Torque: | 104 NM | 130 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.7 seconds | 11.1 seconds | |
|
Chevrolet Kalos is a more dynamic driving. Chevrolet Aveo engine produces 22 HP less power than Chevrolet Kalos, whereas torque is 26 NM less than Chevrolet Kalos. Due to the lower power, Chevrolet Aveo reaches 100 km/h speed 2.6 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.6 | 7.0 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.0 l/100km | 7.9 l/100km | |
|
The Chevrolet Aveo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Chevrolet Aveo consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chevrolet Kalos, which means that by driving the Chevrolet Aveo over 15,000 km in a year you can save 60 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Chevrolet Aveo consumes 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chevrolet Kalos. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 45 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 680 km in combined cycle | 640 km in combined cycle | |
| 810 km on highway | 730 km on highway | ||
| 640 km with real consumption | 560 km with real consumption | ||
| Chevrolet Aveo gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 9 years | 6 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Chevrolet Kalos | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Chevrolet Aveo, Chevrolet Lacetti | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Chevrolet Kalos engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.88 m | 3.88 m | |
| Width: | 1.67 m | 1.67 m | |
| Height: | 1.49 m | 1.50 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Chevrolet Aveo and Chevrolet Kalos are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 175 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
980 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 9.8 meters | 9.8 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`445 | 1`100 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | low | low | |
| Chevrolet Aveo has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Chevrolet Kalos has serious deffects in 40 percent more cases than Chevrolet Aveo, so Chevrolet Aveo quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 1200 | 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Aveo has
|
Chevrolet Kalos has
| |