Chevrolet Aveo 2008 vs Mazda 2 2008
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.4 Petrol | 1.5 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 100 HP | 103 HP | |
| Torque: | 131 NM | 137 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.9 seconds | 10.4 seconds | |
|
Mazda 2 is a more dynamic driving. Chevrolet Aveo engine produces 3 HP less power than Mazda 2, whereas torque is 6 NM less than Mazda 2. Due to the lower power, Chevrolet Aveo reaches 100 km/h speed 1.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.9 | 5.9 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 43 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 760 km in combined cycle | 720 km in combined cycle | |
| 950 km on highway | 870 km on highway | ||
| 610 km with real consumption | 610 km with real consumption | ||
| Chevrolet Aveo gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 17 years | 13 years | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Chevrolet Aveo might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.92 m | 3.90 m | |
| Width: | 1.68 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.50 m | 1.48 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Chevrolet Aveo is 2 cm longer than the Mazda 2, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Chevrolet Aveo is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 220 litres | 250 litres | |
|
Mazda 2 has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Chevrolet Aveo has 30 litres less trunk space than the Mazda 2. This could mean that the Chevrolet Aveo uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10 meters | 9.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chevrolet Aveo is 0.2 metres more than that of the Mazda 2. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`535 | 1`485 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | above average | |
| Mazda 2 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Chevrolet Aveo has serious deffects in 155 percent more cases than Mazda 2, so Mazda 2 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 2800 | 2400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Aveo has
|
Mazda 2 has
| |