Chevrolet Aveo 2008 vs Mazda 2 2010
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.4 Petrol | 1.3 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 100 HP | 75 HP | |
| Torque: | 131 NM | 119 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.9 seconds | 14.9 seconds | |
|
Chevrolet Aveo is more dynamic to drive. Chevrolet Aveo engine produces 25 HP more power than Mazda 2, whereas torque is 12 NM more than Mazda 2. Thanks to more power Chevrolet Aveo reaches 100 km/h speed 3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.9 | 5.1 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.3 l/100km | 6.0 l/100km | |
|
The Mazda 2 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Chevrolet Aveo consumes 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 2, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chevrolet Aveo could require 120 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Chevrolet Aveo consumes 1.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 2. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 43 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 760 km in combined cycle | 840 km in combined cycle | |
| 950 km on highway | 1000 km on highway | ||
| 610 km with real consumption | 710 km with real consumption | ||
| Mazda 2 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 17 years | 13 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Used also on Mazda 3 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Mazda 2 2010 1.3 engine: The engine is generally robust, but the use of poor-quality fuel can lead to increased burn formation. Idling speeds tend to be unstable. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.92 m | 3.92 m | |
| Width: | 1.68 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.50 m | 1.48 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Chevrolet Aveo and Mazda 2 are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 220 litres | 250 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 787 litres | |
|
Mazda 2 has more luggage space. Chevrolet Aveo has 30 litres less trunk space than the Mazda 2. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10 meters | 9.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chevrolet Aveo is 0.2 metres more than that of the Mazda 2. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`535 | 1`485 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | above average | |
| Mazda 2 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Chevrolet Aveo has serious deffects in 155 percent more cases than Mazda 2, so Mazda 2 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 2800 | 3600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Aveo has
|
Mazda 2 has
| |