Chevrolet Aveo 2008 vs Volkswagen Polo 2006
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.2 Petrol | 1.4 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 84 HP | 80 HP | |
| Torque: | 114 NM | 132 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.8 seconds | 12.2 seconds | |
|
Volkswagen Polo is a more dynamic driving. Chevrolet Aveo engine produces 4 HP more power than Volkswagen Polo, but torque is 18 NM less than Volkswagen Polo. Despite the higher power, Chevrolet Aveo reaches 100 km/h speed 0.6 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.5 | 6.4 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.8 l/100km | 6.9 l/100km | |
|
The Chevrolet Aveo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Chevrolet Aveo consumes 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Polo, which means that by driving the Chevrolet Aveo over 15,000 km in a year you can save 135 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Chevrolet Aveo consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Polo. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 45 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 810 km in combined cycle | 700 km in combined cycle | |
| 970 km on highway | 860 km on highway | ||
| 660 km with real consumption | 650 km with real consumption | ||
| Chevrolet Aveo gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.92 m | 3.92 m | |
| Width: | 1.68 m | 1.65 m | |
| Height: | 1.50 m | 1.47 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Chevrolet Aveo and Volkswagen Polo are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 220 litres | 270 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1030 litres | |
|
Volkswagen Polo has more luggage space. Chevrolet Aveo has 50 litres less trunk space than the Volkswagen Polo. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chevrolet Aveo is 0.6 metres less than that of the Volkswagen Polo, which means Chevrolet Aveo can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`455 | 1`650 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | below average | |
| Volkswagen Polo has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Chevrolet Aveo has serious deffects in 45 percent more cases than Volkswagen Polo, so Volkswagen Polo quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 2800 | 2200 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 7.5/10 | 8.0/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Aveo has
|
Volkswagen Polo has
| |