Chevrolet Aveo 2008 vs Mitsubishi Colt 2008
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.2 Petrol | 1.1 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 84 HP | 75 HP | |
| Torque: | 114 NM | 100 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.8 seconds | 13.2 seconds | |
|
Chevrolet Aveo is more dynamic to drive. Chevrolet Aveo engine produces 9 HP more power than Mitsubishi Colt, whereas torque is 14 NM more than Mitsubishi Colt. Thanks to more power Chevrolet Aveo reaches 100 km/h speed 0.4 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.5 | 5.5 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 47 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 810 km in combined cycle | 850 km in combined cycle | |
| 970 km on highway | 1020 km on highway | ||
| 660 km with real consumption | 770 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 8 years | 8 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Used also on Smart ForFour | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mitsubishi Colt might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.92 m | 3.94 m | |
| Width: | 1.68 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.50 m | 1.55 m | |
|
Chevrolet Aveo is smaller. Chevrolet Aveo is 2 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi Colt, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Chevrolet Aveo is 5 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 220 litres | 220 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1032 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chevrolet Aveo is 0.8 metres less than that of the Mitsubishi Colt, which means Chevrolet Aveo can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`455 | 1`450 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | above average | |
| Mitsubishi Colt has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Chevrolet Aveo has serious deffects in 160 percent more cases than Mitsubishi Colt, so Mitsubishi Colt quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 1800 | 2600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Aveo has
|
Mitsubishi Colt has
| |