Chevrolet Aveo 2008 vs Mazda 2 2008
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.2 Petrol | 1.5 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 84 HP | 103 HP | |
| Torque: | 114 NM | 137 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.8 seconds | 10.4 seconds | |
|
Mazda 2 is a more dynamic driving. Chevrolet Aveo engine produces 19 HP less power than Mazda 2, whereas torque is 23 NM less than Mazda 2. Due to the lower power, Chevrolet Aveo reaches 100 km/h speed 2.4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.5 | 5.9 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.8 l/100km | 7.0 l/100km | |
|
The Chevrolet Aveo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Chevrolet Aveo consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 2, which means that by driving the Chevrolet Aveo over 15,000 km in a year you can save 60 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Chevrolet Aveo consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 2. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 43 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 810 km in combined cycle | 720 km in combined cycle | |
| 970 km on highway | 870 km on highway | ||
| 660 km with real consumption | 610 km with real consumption | ||
| Chevrolet Aveo gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 8 years | 13 years | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mazda 2 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.92 m | 3.90 m | |
| Width: | 1.68 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.50 m | 1.48 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Chevrolet Aveo is 2 cm longer than the Mazda 2, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Chevrolet Aveo is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 220 litres | 250 litres | |
|
Mazda 2 has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Chevrolet Aveo has 30 litres less trunk space than the Mazda 2. This could mean that the Chevrolet Aveo uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10 meters | 9.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chevrolet Aveo is 0.2 metres more than that of the Mazda 2. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`455 | 1`485 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | above average | |
| Mazda 2 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Chevrolet Aveo has serious deffects in 155 percent more cases than Mazda 2, so Mazda 2 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 2800 | 2400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Aveo has
|
Mazda 2 has
| |