Chevrolet Aveo 2011 vs Renault Clio 2012
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 115 HP | 200 HP | |
| Torque: | 155 NM | 240 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.3 seconds | 6.7 seconds | |
|
Renault Clio is a more dynamic driving. Chevrolet Aveo engine produces 85 HP less power than Renault Clio, whereas torque is 85 NM less than Renault Clio. Due to the lower power, Chevrolet Aveo reaches 100 km/h speed 4.6 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.6 | 6.3 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.9 l/100km | 8.8 l/100km | |
|
The Chevrolet Aveo is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Chevrolet Aveo consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Renault Clio, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chevrolet Aveo could require 45 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Chevrolet Aveo consumes 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Renault Clio. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 46 litres | 45 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 690 km in combined cycle | 710 km in combined cycle | |
| 860 km on highway | 880 km on highway | ||
| 580 km with real consumption | 510 km with real consumption | ||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 12 years | 5 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Chevrolet Cruze, Chevrolet Trax | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Renault Megane, Renault Espace | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Chevrolet Aveo might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.04 m | 4.09 m | |
| Width: | 1.74 m | 1.73 m | |
| Height: | 1.52 m | 1.43 m | |
| Chevrolet Aveo is 5 cm shorter than the Renault Clio, width is practically the same , while the height of Chevrolet Aveo is 8 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 290 litres | 300 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
653 litres | no data | |
| Chevrolet Aveo has 10 litres less trunk space than the Renault Clio. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.06 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`592 | 1`714 | |
| Safety: | |||
| The Renault Clio scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | below average | low | |
| Chevrolet Aveo has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Renault Clio has serious deffects in 15 percent more cases than Chevrolet Aveo, so Chevrolet Aveo quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | 3400 | 9400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Aveo has
|
Renault Clio has
| |