Chevrolet Aveo 2011 vs Nissan Note 2009
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 115 HP | 110 HP | |
| Torque: | 155 NM | 153 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.3 seconds | 10.7 seconds | |
| Chevrolet Aveo engine produces 5 HP more power than Nissan Note, whereas torque is 2 NM more than Nissan Note. Despite the higher power, Chevrolet Aveo reaches 100 km/h speed 0.6 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.6 | 6.6 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 46 litres | 46 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 690 km in combined cycle | 690 km in combined cycle | |
| 860 km on highway | 830 km on highway | ||
| 580 km with real consumption | 700 km with real consumption | ||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 12 years | 20 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Chevrolet Cruze, Chevrolet Trax | Installed on at least 8 other car models, including Nissan Qashqai, Nissan Almera, Nissan Juke, Nissan Micra | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Nissan Note might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Nissan Note 2009 1.6 engine: A simple and reliable engine, not particularly demanding on fuel quality. Tends to consume more oil, may have problems starting in cold weather. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.04 m | 4.10 m | |
| Width: | 1.74 m | 1.69 m | |
| Height: | 1.52 m | 1.55 m | |
| Chevrolet Aveo is 6 cm shorter than the Nissan Note, 5 cm wider, while the height of Chevrolet Aveo is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 290 litres | 280 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
653 litres | 1332 litres | |
| Even though the car is shorter, Chevrolet Aveo has 10 litres more trunk space than the Nissan Note. The Nissan Note may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Nissan Note (by 679 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.06 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chevrolet Aveo is 0.94 metres less than that of the Nissan Note, which means Chevrolet Aveo can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Power steering: | Hydraulic power steering | Electric power steering | |
| Hydraulic power steering is technologically more complex, louder, increases fuel consumption and requires more servicing. It has the advantages of more power, less strain on the car's electrical system and better feedback (feeling) when steering. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`592 | 1`560 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | below average | |
| Nissan Note has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Chevrolet Aveo, so Nissan Note quality could be a bit better. | |||
| Average price (€): | 3400 | 3400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Aveo has
|
Nissan Note has
| |