Chevrolet Aveo 2011 vs Skoda Fabia 2010
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.2 Diesel | 1.2 Petrol | |
| Diesel (Chevrolet Aveo) engines typically outperform gasoline engines in terms of fuel efficiency and low-end torque. This makes them more economical and better suited for towing or long-distance travel. However, gasoline (Skoda Fabia) engines mostly are lighter, quieter, and offer better acceleration and responsiveness, especially in smaller vehicles. For more information, see the article "Diesel or Petrol: Fuel Economy and Key Differences." | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 95 HP | 105 HP | |
| Torque: | 210 NM | 175 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.6 seconds | 10.1 seconds | |
|
Skoda Fabia is a more dynamic driving. Chevrolet Aveo engine produces 10 HP less power than Skoda Fabia, but torque is 35 NM more than Skoda Fabia. Due to the lower power, Chevrolet Aveo reaches 100 km/h speed 2.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.1 | 5.3 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.1 l/100km | 6.5 l/100km | |
|
The Chevrolet Aveo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Chevrolet Aveo consumes 1.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Fabia, which means that by driving the Chevrolet Aveo over 15,000 km in a year you can save 180 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Chevrolet Aveo consumes 1.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Fabia. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 46 litres | 45 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1120 km in combined cycle | 840 km in combined cycle | |
| 1270 km on highway | 1000 km on highway | ||
| 900 km with real consumption | 690 km with real consumption | ||
| Chevrolet Aveo gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Skoda Fabia 2010 1.2 engine: Although the engine has a chain, its lifetime is relatively short. Vibration at idling speed tends to be excessive. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.04 m | 4.00 m | |
| Width: | 1.74 m | 1.64 m | |
| Height: | 1.52 m | 1.50 m | |
|
Chevrolet Aveo is larger. Chevrolet Aveo is 4 cm longer than the Skoda Fabia, 9 cm wider, while the height of Chevrolet Aveo is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 290 litres | 300 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
653 litres | no data | |
| Despite its longer length, Chevrolet Aveo has 10 litres less trunk space than the Skoda Fabia. This could mean that the Chevrolet Aveo uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.1 meters | 10 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chevrolet Aveo is 0.1 metres more than that of the Skoda Fabia. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`675 | 1`585 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Chevrolet Aveo scores higher in safety tests, but Skoda Fabia is better rated in child safety tests. The Chevrolet Aveo scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | below average | average | |
| Skoda Fabia has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Chevrolet Aveo has serious deffects in 15 percent more cases than Skoda Fabia, so Skoda Fabia quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | 2800 | 2600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Aveo has
|
Skoda Fabia has
| |