Chevrolet Aveo 2011 vs Renault Clio 2012
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.2 Diesel | 1.5 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 95 HP | 90 HP | |
| Torque: | 210 NM | 200 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.6 seconds | 12.1 seconds | |
| Chevrolet Aveo engine produces 5 HP more power than Renault Clio, whereas torque is 10 NM more than Renault Clio. Despite the higher power, Chevrolet Aveo reaches 100 km/h speed 0.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.1 | 3.2 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.1 l/100km | 4.8 l/100km | |
|
The Renault Clio is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Chevrolet Aveo consumes 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Renault Clio, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chevrolet Aveo could require 135 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Chevrolet Aveo consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Renault Clio. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 46 litres | 45 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1120 km in combined cycle | 1400 km in combined cycle | |
| 1270 km on highway | 1500 km on highway | ||
| 900 km with real consumption | 930 km with real consumption | ||
| Renault Clio gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Renault Clio 2012 1.5 engine: The engine has many modifications, is sufficiently common and spare parts are available. The fuel consumption/power ratio is good. The fuel injection system can be a problem and the timing belt change interval ... More about Renault Clio 2012 1.5 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.04 m | 4.06 m | |
| Width: | 1.74 m | 1.73 m | |
| Height: | 1.52 m | 1.45 m | |
| Chevrolet Aveo is 2 cm shorter than the Renault Clio, width is practically the same , while the height of Chevrolet Aveo is 7 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 290 litres | 300 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
653 litres | 1146 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.1 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chevrolet Aveo is 0.5 metres less than that of the Renault Clio, which means Chevrolet Aveo can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 1`675 kg | 1`658 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`185 kg | 1`071 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 490 kg | 587 kg | |
| Chevrolet Aveo load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 20 procentiem less than Renault Clio. Therefore, Renault Clio is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | |||
| The Renault Clio scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | below average | low | |
| Chevrolet Aveo has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Renault Clio has serious deffects in 15 percent more cases than Chevrolet Aveo, so Chevrolet Aveo quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | 2800 | 4800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Aveo has
|
Renault Clio has
| |