Chevrolet Aveo 2011 vs Mazda 2 2015
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.2 Diesel | 1.5 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 95 HP | 105 HP | |
| Torque: | 210 NM | 220 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.6 seconds | 10.1 seconds | |
|
Mazda 2 is a more dynamic driving. Chevrolet Aveo engine produces 10 HP less power than Mazda 2, whereas torque is 10 NM less than Mazda 2. Due to the lower power, Chevrolet Aveo reaches 100 km/h speed 2.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.1 | 3.4 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.1 l/100km | 4.6 l/100km | |
|
The Mazda 2 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Chevrolet Aveo consumes 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 2, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chevrolet Aveo could require 105 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Chevrolet Aveo consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 2. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 46 litres | 43 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1120 km in combined cycle | 1260 km in combined cycle | |
| 1270 km on highway | 1340 km on highway | ||
| 900 km with real consumption | 930 km with real consumption | ||
| Mazda 2 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.04 m | 4.06 m | |
| Width: | 1.74 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.52 m | 1.50 m | |
| Chevrolet Aveo is 2 cm shorter than the Mazda 2, 4 cm wider, while the height of Chevrolet Aveo is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 290 litres | 280 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
653 litres | 950 litres | |
| Even though the car is shorter, Chevrolet Aveo has 10 litres more trunk space than the Mazda 2. The Mazda 2 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mazda 2 (by 297 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.1 meters | 9.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chevrolet Aveo is 0.7 metres more than that of the Mazda 2, which means Chevrolet Aveo can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`675 | 1`575 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Chevrolet Aveo is better rated in child safety tests. The Chevrolet Aveo scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | below average | high | |
| Mazda 2 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Chevrolet Aveo has serious deffects in 335 percent more cases than Mazda 2, so Mazda 2 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 3400 | 10 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Aveo has
|
Mazda 2 has
| |