Chevrolet Aveo 2011 vs Renault Clio 2012
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.2 Petrol | 0.9 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 86 HP | 90 HP | |
| Torque: | 115 NM | 135 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.6 seconds | 11.8 seconds | |
|
Renault Clio is a more dynamic driving. Chevrolet Aveo engine produces 4 HP less power than Renault Clio, whereas torque is 20 NM less than Renault Clio. Due to the lower power, Chevrolet Aveo reaches 100 km/h speed 1.8 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.1 | 4.3 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.7 l/100km | 6.3 l/100km | |
|
The Renault Clio is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Chevrolet Aveo consumes 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Renault Clio, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chevrolet Aveo could require 120 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Chevrolet Aveo consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Renault Clio. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 46 litres | 40 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 900 km in combined cycle | 930 km in combined cycle | |
| 1060 km on highway | 1080 km on highway | ||
| 680 km with real consumption | 630 km with real consumption | ||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 5 years | 13 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Opel Corsa, Opel Adam | Installed on at least 5 other car models, including Dacia Logan, Renault Captur, Nissan Micra, Smart ForFour | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Renault Clio might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Chevrolet Aveo engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.04 m | 4.06 m | |
| Width: | 1.74 m | 1.73 m | |
| Height: | 1.52 m | 1.45 m | |
| Chevrolet Aveo is 2 cm shorter than the Renault Clio, width is practically the same , while the height of Chevrolet Aveo is 7 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 290 litres | 300 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
653 litres | no data | |
| Chevrolet Aveo has 10 litres less trunk space than the Renault Clio. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chevrolet Aveo is 0.6 metres less than that of the Renault Clio, which means Chevrolet Aveo can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`535 | 1`588 | |
| Safety: | |||
| The Renault Clio scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | below average | low | |
| Chevrolet Aveo has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Renault Clio has serious deffects in 15 percent more cases than Chevrolet Aveo, so Chevrolet Aveo quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | 3400 | 9400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Aveo has
|
Renault Clio has
| |