Chevrolet Aveo 2011 vs Nissan Note 2009
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.2 Petrol | 1.4 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 86 HP | 88 HP | |
| Torque: | 115 NM | 128 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.6 seconds | 13.4 seconds | |
|
Nissan Note is a more dynamic driving. Chevrolet Aveo engine produces 2 HP less power than Nissan Note, whereas torque is 13 NM less than Nissan Note. Due to the lower power, Chevrolet Aveo reaches 100 km/h speed 0.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.1 | 5.9 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.7 l/100km | 6.4 l/100km | |
|
By specification Chevrolet Aveo consumes 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Note, which means that by driving the Chevrolet Aveo over 15,000 km in a year you can save 120 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Chevrolet Aveo consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Note. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 46 litres | 46 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 900 km in combined cycle | 770 km in combined cycle | |
| 1060 km on highway | 900 km on highway | ||
| 680 km with real consumption | 710 km with real consumption | ||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 330'000 km | 300'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 5 years | 11 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Opel Corsa, Opel Adam | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Nissan Micra, Nissan Cube | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Nissan Note might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Chevrolet Aveo engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.04 m | 4.10 m | |
| Width: | 1.74 m | 1.69 m | |
| Height: | 1.52 m | 1.55 m | |
| Chevrolet Aveo is 6 cm shorter than the Nissan Note, 5 cm wider, while the height of Chevrolet Aveo is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 290 litres | 280 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
653 litres | 1332 litres | |
| Even though the car is shorter, Chevrolet Aveo has 10 litres more trunk space than the Nissan Note. The Nissan Note may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Nissan Note (by 679 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chevrolet Aveo is 1 metres less than that of the Nissan Note, which means Chevrolet Aveo can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`535 | 1`546 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | below average | |
| Nissan Note has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Chevrolet Aveo, so Nissan Note quality could be a bit better. | |||
| Average price (€): | 3400 | 3400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Aveo has
|
Nissan Note has
| |