Chevrolet Aveo 2011 vs Kia RIO 2011
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.2 Petrol | 1.2 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 86 HP | 85 HP | |
| Torque: | 115 NM | 121 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.6 seconds | 13.1 seconds | |
|
Kia RIO is a more dynamic driving. Chevrolet Aveo engine produces 1 HP more power than Kia RIO, but torque is 6 NM less than Kia RIO. Despite the higher power, Chevrolet Aveo reaches 100 km/h speed 0.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.1 | 4.8 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.7 l/100km | 6.6 l/100km | |
|
The Kia RIO is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Chevrolet Aveo consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Kia RIO, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chevrolet Aveo could require 45 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Chevrolet Aveo consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Kia RIO. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 46 litres | 43 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 900 km in combined cycle | 890 km in combined cycle | |
| 1060 km on highway | 1020 km on highway | ||
| 680 km with real consumption | 650 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 330'000 km | 390'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Kia RIO engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 5 years | 17 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Opel Corsa, Opel Adam | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Hyundai i20, Hyundai i10, Kia Picanto | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Kia RIO might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Kia RIO 2011 1.2 engine: Most owners speak positively about this engine. It has a simple and reliable design with no major engineering flaws. The main downsides are noticeable noise, vibrations, and modest power output. With proper ... More about Kia RIO 2011 1.2 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.04 m | 4.05 m | |
| Width: | 1.74 m | 1.72 m | |
| Height: | 1.52 m | 1.46 m | |
| Chevrolet Aveo and Kia RIO are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 290 litres | 224 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
653 litres | no data | |
|
Chevrolet Aveo has more luggage capacity. Chevrolet Aveo has 66 litres more trunk space than the Kia RIO. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10 meters | 10.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chevrolet Aveo is 0.5 metres less than that of the Kia RIO, which means Chevrolet Aveo can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`535 | 1`560 | |
| Safety: | |||
| The Chevrolet Aveo scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | below average | average | |
| Kia RIO has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Chevrolet Aveo has serious deffects in 20 percent more cases than Kia RIO, so Kia RIO quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | 3400 | 3800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Aveo has
|
Kia RIO has
| |