Chevrolet Aveo 2008 vs Mitsubishi Colt 2008
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.2 - 1.4 | 1.1 - 1.5 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 84 - 100 HP | 75 - 109 HP | |
| Torque: | 114 - 131 NM | 100 - 145 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.9 - 12.8 seconds | 10 - 13.2 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.5 - 6.4 | 5.5 - 6.2 | |
|
Chevrolet Aveo petrol engines consumes on average 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than Mitsubishi Colt. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.92 m | 3.94 m | |
| Width: | 1.68 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.50 m | 1.55 m | |
|
Chevrolet Aveo is smaller. Chevrolet Aveo is 2 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi Colt, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Chevrolet Aveo is 5 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 220 litres | 220 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1032 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chevrolet Aveo is 0.8 metres less than that of the Mitsubishi Colt, which means Chevrolet Aveo can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`508 | ~ 1`457 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 1800 | 2600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Aveo has
|
Mitsubishi Colt has
| |