Chevrolet Aveo 2011 vs Volkswagen Polo 2005
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.2 - 1.6 | 1.2 - 1.9 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 70 - 115 HP | 55 - 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 115 - 210 NM | 108 - 310 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.3 - 14.3 seconds | 8.2 - 17.5 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 3.8 - 7.2 | 4.4 - 7.8 | |
|
Chevrolet Aveo petrol engines consumes on average 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than Volkswagen Polo. On average, Chevrolet Aveo equipped with diesel engines consume 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Polo. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.04 m | 3.92 m | |
| Width: | 1.74 m | 1.65 m | |
| Height: | 1.52 m | 1.47 m | |
|
Chevrolet Aveo is larger. Chevrolet Aveo is 12 cm longer than the Volkswagen Polo, 9 cm wider, while the height of Chevrolet Aveo is 5 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 290 litres | 270 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
653 litres | 1030 litres | |
| Chevrolet Aveo has 20 litres more trunk space than the Volkswagen Polo. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volkswagen Polo (by 377 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.1 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chevrolet Aveo is 0.5 metres less than that of the Volkswagen Polo, which means Chevrolet Aveo can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`594 | ~ 1`663 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 3400 | 2200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Aveo has
|
Volkswagen Polo has
| |