Chevrolet Astro 1992 vs Volvo XC90 2005
| Body: | Minivan / MPV | Crossover / SUV | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Crossovers and SUVs have better off-road capabilities (higher ground clearance, can have 4x4 drive), they are preferable for driving on unpaved roads and rural areas. Also, the driver's seating position is higher in a crossover or SUVs, which provides better visibility also in city. This usually comes at the cost of higher fuel consumption, increased weight and higher maintenance costs. | |||
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
| Engine: | 4.3 Petrol | 4.4 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 204 HP | 315 HP | |
| Torque: | 353 NM | 440 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 7.3 seconds | |
| Chevrolet Astro engine produces 111 HP less power than Volvo XC90, whereas torque is 87 NM less than Volvo XC90. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 13.0 | 14.0 | |
|
The Chevrolet Astro is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Chevrolet Astro consumes 1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo XC90, which means that by driving the Chevrolet Astro over 15,000 km in a year you can save 150 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 102 litres | 80 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 780 km in combined cycle | 570 km in combined cycle | |
| Chevrolet Astro gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.49 m | 4.80 m | |
| Width: | 1.97 m | 1.90 m | |
| Height: | 1.94 m | 1.74 m | |
| Chevrolet Astro is 31 cm shorter than the Volvo XC90, 7 cm wider, while the height of Chevrolet Astro is 20 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 249 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 2404 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | 12.7 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`760 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | low | |
| Average price (€): | 2800 | 3800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Astro has
|
Volvo XC90 has
| |