Chevrolet Astro 1992 vs Volvo XC90 2005

 
Chevrolet Astro
1992 - 1995
Volvo XC90
2005 - 2006
Body: Minivan / MPVCrossover / SUV
Crossovers and SUVs have better off-road capabilities (higher ground clearance, can have 4x4 drive), they are preferable for driving on unpaved roads and rural areas. Also, the driver's seating position is higher in a crossover or SUVs, which provides better visibility also in city. This usually comes at the cost of higher fuel consumption, increased weight and higher maintenance costs.
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 4.3 Petrol4.4 Petrol

Performance

Power: 204 HP315 HP
Torque: 353 NM440 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: n/a seconds7.3 seconds
Chevrolet Astro engine produces 111 HP less power than Volvo XC90, whereas torque is 87 NM less than Volvo XC90.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 13.014.0
The Chevrolet Astro is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Chevrolet Astro consumes 1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo XC90, which means that by driving the Chevrolet Astro over 15,000 km in a year you can save 150 litres of fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 102 litres80 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 780 km in combined cycle570 km in combined cycle
Chevrolet Astro gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Drive type

Wheel drive type: Rear wheel drive (RWD)All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)

Dimensions

Length: 4.49 m4.80 m
Width: 1.97 m1.90 m
Height: 1.94 m1.74 m
Chevrolet Astro is 31 cm shorter than the Volvo XC90, 7 cm wider, while the height of Chevrolet Astro is 20 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: no data249 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
no data2404 litres
Turning diameter: no data12.7 meters
Gross weight (kg): no data2`760
Safety: no data
Quality: no data
low
Average price (€): 32004200
Pros and Cons: Chevrolet Astro has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • lower price
Volvo XC90 has
  • more power
  • has 4x4 drive
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv