Chevrolet Astro 1992 vs Chrysler Grand Voyager 2001
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 4.3 Petrol | 3.8 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 204 HP | 218 HP | |
Torque: | 353 NM | 332 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 11 seconds | |
Chevrolet Astro engine produces 14 HP less power than Chrysler Grand Voyager, but torque is 21 NM more than Chrysler Grand Voyager. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 13.0 | 13.0 | |
Fuel tank capacity: | 102 litres | 75 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 780 km in combined cycle | 570 km in combined cycle | |
Chevrolet Astro gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Front-wheel drive cars (Chrysler Grand Voyager) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (Chevrolet Astro) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.49 m | 5.09 m | |
Width: | 1.97 m | 2.00 m | |
Height: | 1.94 m | 1.75 m | |
Chevrolet Astro is smaller, but higher. Chevrolet Astro is 60 cm shorter than the Chrysler Grand Voyager, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Chevrolet Astro is 19 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | no data | 920 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 4130 litres | |
Turning diameter: | no data | no data | |
Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`630 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | no data | no data | |
Average price (€): | 3200 | 1200 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Astro has
|
Chrysler Grand Voyager has
| |