Chevrolet Astro 1985 vs Volvo XC90 2005

 
Chevrolet Astro
1985 - 1995
Volvo XC90
2005 - 2006
Body: Minivan / MPVCrossover / SUV
Crossovers and SUVs have better off-road capabilities (higher ground clearance, can have 4x4 drive), they are preferable for driving on unpaved roads and rural areas. Also, the driver's seating position is higher in a crossover or SUVs, which provides better visibility also in city. This usually comes at the cost of higher fuel consumption, increased weight and higher maintenance costs.
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 4.3 Petrol4.4 Petrol

Performance

Power: 167 HP315 HP
Torque: 319 NM440 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: n/a seconds7.3 seconds
Chevrolet Astro engine produces 148 HP less power than Volvo XC90, whereas torque is 121 NM less than Volvo XC90.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 13.114.0
The Chevrolet Astro is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Chevrolet Astro consumes 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo XC90, which means that by driving the Chevrolet Astro over 15,000 km in a year you can save 135 litres of fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 102 litres80 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 770 km in combined cycle570 km in combined cycle
Chevrolet Astro gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Drive type

Wheel drive type: Rear wheel drive (RWD)All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)

Dimensions

Length: 4.49 m4.80 m
Width: 1.97 m1.90 m
Height: 1.94 m1.74 m
Chevrolet Astro is 31 cm shorter than the Volvo XC90, 7 cm wider, while the height of Chevrolet Astro is 20 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: no data249 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
no data2404 litres
Turning diameter: no data12.7 meters
Gross weight (kg): 2`6992`760
Safety: no data
Quality: no data
low
Average price (€): 32004200
Pros and Cons: Chevrolet Astro has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • lower price
Volvo XC90 has
  • more power
  • has 4x4 drive
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv