Chevrolet Astro 1985 vs Volkswagen Caravelle 1990

 
Chevrolet Astro
1985 - 1995
Volkswagen Caravelle
1990 - 1996
Gearbox: AutomaticManual
Engine: 4.3 Petrol2.5 Petrol

Performance

Power: 167 HP110 HP
Torque: 319 NM190 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: n/a secondsn/a seconds
Chevrolet Astro engine produces 57 HP more power than Volkswagen Caravelle, whereas torque is 129 NM more than Volkswagen Caravelle.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 13.1no data
Fuel tank capacity: 102 litres80 litres
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Drive type

Wheel drive type: Rear wheel drive (RWD)Front wheel drive (FWD)
Front-wheel drive cars (Volkswagen Caravelle) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (Chevrolet Astro) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions.

Dimensions

Length: 4.49 m4.79 m
Width: 1.97 m1.84 m
Height: 1.94 m1.94 m
Chevrolet Astro is 30 cm shorter than the Volkswagen Caravelle, 13 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly.
Trunk capacity: no data540 litres
Turning diameter: no datano data
Gross weight (kg): 2`6992`590
Safety: no datano data
Quality: no datano data
Average price (€): 28003000
Pros and Cons: Chevrolet Astro has
  • more power
    Share these results to social networks or e-mail
    Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv