Chevrolet Astro 1995 vs Volkswagen Caravelle 1990

 
Chevrolet Astro
1995 - 2005
Volkswagen Caravelle
1990 - 1996
Gearbox: AutomaticManual
Engine: 4.3 Petrol2.5 Petrol

Performance

Power: 190 HP110 HP
Torque: 339 NM190 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: n/a secondsn/a seconds
Chevrolet Astro engine produces 80 HP more power than Volkswagen Caravelle, whereas torque is 149 NM more than Volkswagen Caravelle.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 12.5no data
Fuel tank capacity: 102 litres80 litres

Drive type

Wheel drive type: Rear wheel drive (RWD)Front wheel drive (FWD)
Front-wheel drive cars (Volkswagen Caravelle) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (Chevrolet Astro) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions.

Dimensions

Length: 4.82 m4.79 m
Width: 1.97 m1.84 m
Height: 1.90 m1.94 m
Chevrolet Astro is larger, but slightly lower.
Chevrolet Astro is 3 cm longer than the Volkswagen Caravelle, 13 cm wider, while the height of Chevrolet Astro is 4 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 1170 litres540 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
4825 litresno data
Chevrolet Astro has more luggage capacity.
Chevrolet Astro has 630 litres more trunk space than the Volkswagen Caravelle.
Turning diameter: no datano data
Gross weight (kg): 2`7002`590
Safety: no datano data
Quality: no datano data
Average price (€): 60003400
Pros and Cons: Chevrolet Astro has
  • more power
  • roomier boot
Volkswagen Caravelle has
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv