Chevrolet Astro 1995 vs Toyota Picnic 1997
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 4.3 Petrol | 2.2 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 190 HP | 90 HP | |
| Torque: | 339 NM | 205 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 13.9 seconds | |
| Chevrolet Astro engine produces 100 HP more power than Toyota Picnic, whereas torque is 134 NM more than Toyota Picnic. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 12.5 | 7.7 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 13.8 l/100km | 7.5 l/100km | |
|
The Toyota Picnic is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Chevrolet Astro consumes 4.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Picnic, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chevrolet Astro could require 720 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Chevrolet Astro consumes 6.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Picnic. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 102 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 810 km in combined cycle | 770 km in combined cycle | |
| 920 km on highway | 930 km on highway | ||
| 730 km with real consumption | 800 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Front-wheel drive cars (Toyota Picnic) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (Chevrolet Astro) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.82 m | 4.53 m | |
| Width: | 1.97 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.90 m | 1.62 m | |
|
Chevrolet Astro is larger. Chevrolet Astro is 29 cm longer than the Toyota Picnic, 27 cm wider, while the height of Chevrolet Astro is 28 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 1170 litres | 180 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
4825 litres | 1840 litres | |
|
Chevrolet Astro has more luggage capacity. Chevrolet Astro has 990 litres more trunk space than the Toyota Picnic. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Chevrolet Astro (by 2985 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`700 | 2`010 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | high | |
| Average price (€): | 6200 | 2200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Astro has
|
Toyota Picnic has
| |