Chevrolet Astro 1995 vs Toyota Picnic 1997

 
Chevrolet Astro
1995 - 2005
Toyota Picnic
1997 - 2001
Gearbox: AutomaticManual
Engine: 4.3 Petrol2.2 Diesel

Performance

Power: 190 HP90 HP
Torque: 339 NM205 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: n/a seconds13.9 seconds
Chevrolet Astro engine produces 100 HP more power than Toyota Picnic, whereas torque is 134 NM more than Toyota Picnic.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 12.57.7
Real fuel consumption: 13.8 l/100km7.5 l/100km
The Toyota Picnic is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Chevrolet Astro consumes 4.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Picnic, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chevrolet Astro could require 720 litres more fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Chevrolet Astro consumes 6.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Picnic.
Fuel tank capacity: 102 litres60 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 810 km in combined cycle770 km in combined cycle
920 km on highway930 km on highway
730 km with real consumption800 km with real consumption

Drive type

Wheel drive type: Rear wheel drive (RWD)Front wheel drive (FWD)
Front-wheel drive cars (Toyota Picnic) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (Chevrolet Astro) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions.

Dimensions

Length: 4.82 m4.53 m
Width: 1.97 m1.70 m
Height: 1.90 m1.62 m
Chevrolet Astro is larger.
Chevrolet Astro is 29 cm longer than the Toyota Picnic, 27 cm wider, while the height of Chevrolet Astro is 28 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 1170 litres180 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
4825 litres1840 litres
Chevrolet Astro has more luggage capacity.
Chevrolet Astro has 990 litres more trunk space than the Toyota Picnic. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Chevrolet Astro (by 2985 litres).
Turning diameter: no data11 meters
Gross weight (kg): 2`7002`010
Safety: no data
Quality: no data
high
Average price (€): 62002200
Pros and Cons: Chevrolet Astro has
  • more power
  • roomier boot
Toyota Picnic has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv