Chevrolet Astro 1985 vs Volvo XC90 2002
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Body: | Minivan / MPV | Crossover / SUV | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Crossovers and SUVs have better off-road capabilities (higher ground clearance, can have 4x4 drive), they are preferable for driving on unpaved roads and rural areas. Also, the driver's seating position is higher in a crossover or SUVs, which provides better visibility also in city. This usually comes at the cost of higher fuel consumption, increased weight and higher maintenance costs. | |||
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
| Chevrolet Astro is available only with automatic gearbox, whereas Volvo XC90 has both automatic and manual transmission options. | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Chevrolet Astro is available only with rear wheel drive, while Volvo XC90 can be equipped with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. | |||
| Engines: | 4.3 (petrol) | 2.4 - 4.4 (petrol, diesel) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 167 - 204 HP | 163 - 315 HP | |
| Torque: | 319 - 353 NM | 320 - 440 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 7.3 - 12 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 13.0 - 13.1 | 8.2 - 14.0 | |
|
Chevrolet Astro petrol engines consumes on average 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than Volvo XC90. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.49 m | 4.80 m | |
| Width: | 1.97 m | 1.90 m | |
| Height: | 1.94 m | 1.75 m | |
| Chevrolet Astro is 31 cm shorter than the Volvo XC90, 7 cm wider, while the height of Chevrolet Astro is 19 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 530 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 2404 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | 12.7 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`699 | ~ 2`737 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | low | |
| Average price (€): | 3200 | 4200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Astro has
|
Volvo XC90 has
| |