Chevrolet Astro 1985 vs Chrysler Grand Voyager 2001
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chevrolet Astro is available only with automatic gearbox, whereas Chrysler Grand Voyager has both automatic and manual transmission options. | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Chevrolet Astro is available only with rear wheel drive, while Chrysler Grand Voyager can be equipped with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. | |||
| Engines: | 4.3 (petrol) | 2.4 - 3.8 (petrol, diesel) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 167 - 204 HP | 140 - 218 HP | |
| Torque: | 319 - 353 NM | 226 - 360 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 11 - 14.2 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 13.0 - 13.1 | 7.7 - 13.0 | |
|
Chevrolet Astro petrol engines consumes on average 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than Chrysler Grand Voyager. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.49 m | 5.09 m | |
| Width: | 1.97 m | 2.00 m | |
| Height: | 1.94 m | 1.75 m | |
|
Chevrolet Astro is smaller, but higher. Chevrolet Astro is 60 cm shorter than the Chrysler Grand Voyager, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Chevrolet Astro is 19 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 920 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 4130 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | 12 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`699 | ~ 2`630 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1600 | 1400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Astro has
|
Chrysler Grand Voyager has
| |