Chevrolet Astro 1985 vs Dodge Charger 2005
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Body: | Minivan / MPV | Coupe | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Chevrolet Astro is available only with rear wheel drive, while Dodge Charger can be equipped with rear wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. | |||
| Engines: | 4.3 | 2.7 - 6.1 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 167 - 204 HP | 193 - 432 HP | |
| Torque: | 319 - 353 NM | 258 - 569 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 4.9 - 6 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 13.0 - 13.1 | 9.8 - 14.7 | |
|
Chevrolet Astro petrol engines consumes on average 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than Dodge Charger. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.49 m | 5.08 m | |
| Width: | 1.97 m | 1.89 m | |
| Height: | 1.94 m | 1.48 m | |
| Chevrolet Astro is 59 cm shorter than the Dodge Charger, 8 cm wider, while the height of Chevrolet Astro is 46 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 460 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11.9 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`699 | ~ 2`185 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1600 | 6800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Astro has
|
Dodge Charger has
| |