Chevrolet Astro 1995 vs Mazda 3 2003

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
Chevrolet Astro
1995 - 2005
Mazda 3
2003 - 2006
Body: Minivan / MPVSedan
Gearbox: Automatic Manual/Automatic
Chevrolet Astro is available only with automatic gearbox, whereas Mazda 3 has both automatic and manual transmission options.
Wheel drive type: Rear wheel drive (RWD)Front wheel drive (FWD)
Chevrolet Astro is available with rear wheel drive, while Mazda 3 can be equipped with front wheel drive.
Engines: 4.3 (petrol)1.6 - 2.0 (petrol, diesel)
Both cars are available with petrol engines. Mazda 3 is available also with diesel engines. Diesel engines typically offer better fuel efficiency and higher torque compared to other engine types.

Performance

Power: 190 HP105 - 150 HP
Torque: 339 NM145 - 245 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: n/a seconds9 - 12.4 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 12.55.0 - 8.2
Chevrolet Astro petrol engines consumes on average 4.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than Mazda 3.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Dimensions

Length: 4.82 m4.49 m
Width: 1.97 m1.76 m
Height: 1.90 m1.46 m
Chevrolet Astro is larger.
Chevrolet Astro is 33 cm longer than the Mazda 3, 21 cm wider, while the height of Chevrolet Astro is 44 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 1170 litres413 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
4825 litres675 litres
Chevrolet Astro has more luggage capacity.
Chevrolet Astro has 757 litres more trunk space than the Mazda 3. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Chevrolet Astro (by 4150 litres).
Turning diameter: no data10.3 meters
Gross weight (kg): ~ 2`700~ 1`718
Safety: no datano data
Quality: no data
high
Average price (€): 62001000
Pros and Cons: Chevrolet Astro has
  • automatic transmission only
  • only petrol engines available
  • roomier boot
Mazda 3 has
  • both manual and automatic
  • petrol and diesel engines available
  • lower fuel consumption for petrol engines
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv