Chevrolet Astro 1995 vs Chrysler Pacifica 2003
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Body: | Minivan / MPV | Crossover / SUV | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Crossovers and SUVs have better off-road capabilities (higher ground clearance, can have 4x4 drive), they are preferable for driving on unpaved roads and rural areas. Also, the driver's seating position is higher in a crossover or SUVs, which provides better visibility also in city. This usually comes at the cost of higher fuel consumption, increased weight and higher maintenance costs. | |||
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Chevrolet Astro is available only with rear wheel drive, while Chrysler Pacifica can be equipped with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. | |||
| Engines: | 4.3 | 3.5 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 190 HP | 253 HP | |
| Torque: | 339 NM | 339 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 10 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 12.5 | 11.3 - 12.3 | |
|
Chevrolet Astro petrol engines consumes on average 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than Chrysler Pacifica. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.82 m | 5.05 m | |
| Width: | 1.97 m | 2.01 m | |
| Height: | 1.90 m | 1.69 m | |
|
Chevrolet Astro is smaller, but higher. Chevrolet Astro is 23 cm shorter than the Chrysler Pacifica, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Chevrolet Astro is 22 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 1170 litres | 369 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
4825 litres | 2250 litres | |
|
Chevrolet Astro has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Chevrolet Astro has 801 litres more trunk space than the Chrysler Pacifica. The Chrysler Pacifica may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Chevrolet Astro (by 2575 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 9.9 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`700 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 6200 | 1800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Astro has
|
Chrysler Pacifica has
| |