BMW i3 2017 vs Seat Ateca 2016
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Body: | Hatchback | Crossover / SUV | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Crossovers and SUVs have better off-road capabilities (higher ground clearance, can have 4x4 drive), they are preferable for driving on unpaved roads and rural areas. Also, the driver's seating position is higher in a crossover or SUVs, which provides better visibility also in city. This usually comes at the cost of higher fuel consumption, increased weight and higher maintenance costs. | |||
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
| BMW i3 is available only with automatic gearbox, whereas Seat Ateca has both automatic and manual transmission options. | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| BMW i3 is available only with rear wheel drive, while Seat Ateca can be equipped with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. | |||
| Engines: | 0.6 | 1.0 - 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 38 - 170 HP | 115 - 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 56 - 250 NM | 200 - 340 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.3 - 8.1 seconds | 8.3 - 11 seconds | |
| In general, Seat Ateca are available with more powerful and dynamic engines than BMW i3. Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 0.6 | 4.3 - 5.5 | |
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.01 m | 4.34 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.60 m | 1.60 m | |
|
BMW i3 is smaller. BMW i3 is 33 cm shorter than the Seat Ateca, 3 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 260 litres | 510 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1100 litres | no data | |
|
Seat Ateca has more luggage space. BMW i3 has 250 litres less trunk space than the Seat Ateca. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.9 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the BMW i3 is 0.9 metres less than that of the Seat Ateca, which means BMW i3 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | ~ 1`715 kg | ~ 1`937 kg | |
| Net weight: | ~ 1`305 kg | ~ 1`321 kg | |
| Load capacity: | ~ 410 kg | ~ 616 kg | |
| BMW i3 load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 50 procentiem less than Seat Ateca. Therefore, Seat Ateca is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 16 200 | 13 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
BMW i3 has
|
Seat Ateca has
| |