BMW i3 2013 vs Skoda Fabia 2015
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
BMW i3 is available only with automatic gearbox, whereas Skoda Fabia has both automatic and manual transmission options. | |||
Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
BMW i3 is available with rear wheel drive, while Skoda Fabia can be equipped with front wheel drive. | |||
Engines: | 0.6 | 1.0 - 1.4 | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 38 - 170 HP | 60 - 110 HP | |
Torque: | 56 - 250 NM | 95 - 250 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.2 - 7.9 seconds | 9.4 - 15.7 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 0.6 | 3.4 - 4.8 | |
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.00 m | 3.99 m | |
Width: | 1.78 m | 1.73 m | |
Height: | 1.58 m | 1.47 m | |
BMW i3 is larger. BMW i3 and Skoda Fabia are practically the same length. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 260 litres | 330 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1100 litres | 1150 litres | |
Skoda Fabia has more luggage space. BMW i3 has 70 litres less trunk space than the Skoda Fabia. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Skoda Fabia (by 50 litres). | |||
Turning diameter: | 9.9 meters | 10.4 meters | |
The turning circle of the BMW i3 is 0.5 metres less than that of the Skoda Fabia, which means BMW i3 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`675 | ~ 1`585 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | no data | average | |
Average price (€): | no data | 7600 | |
Pros and Cons: |
BMW i3 has
|
Skoda Fabia has
| |