BMW i3 2013 vs Honda CR-V 2010
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Body: | Hatchback | Crossover / SUV | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Crossovers and SUVs have better off-road capabilities (higher ground clearance, can have 4x4 drive), they are preferable for driving on unpaved roads and rural areas. Also, the driver's seating position is higher in a crossover or SUVs, which provides better visibility also in city. This usually comes at the cost of higher fuel consumption, increased weight and higher maintenance costs. | |||
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
| BMW i3 is available only with automatic gearbox, whereas Honda CR-V has both automatic and manual transmission options. | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| BMW i3 is available with rear wheel drive, while Honda CR-V can be equipped with four wheel (4x4) drive. | |||
| Engines: | 0.6 | 2.0 - 2.4 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 38 - 170 HP | 150 - 166 HP | |
| Torque: | 56 - 250 NM | 192 - 350 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.2 - 7.9 seconds | 9.6 - 12.2 seconds | |
| In general, Honda CR-V are available with more powerful and dynamic engines than BMW i3. Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 0.6 | 6.5 - 9.5 | |
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 140 mm (5.5 inches) | 170 - 185 mm (6.7 - 7.3 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Honda CR-V can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.00 m | 4.55 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.58 m | 1.68 m | |
|
BMW i3 is smaller. BMW i3 is 55 cm shorter than the Honda CR-V, 5 cm narrower, while the height of BMW i3 is 10 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 260 litres | 524 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1100 litres | 1532 litres | |
|
Honda CR-V has more luggage space. BMW i3 has 264 litres less trunk space than the Honda CR-V. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Honda CR-V (by 432 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.9 meters | 11.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the BMW i3 is 1.9 metres less than that of the Honda CR-V, which means BMW i3 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | ~ 1`675 kg | ~ 2`113 kg | |
| Net weight: | ~ 1`255 kg | ~ 1`684 kg | |
| Load capacity: | ~ 420 kg | ~ 429 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 10 600 | 6600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
BMW i3 has
|
Honda CR-V has
| |