BMW Z4 2018 vs Volkswagen Polo 2009

 
BMW Z4
2018 -
Volkswagen Polo
2009 - 2014
Body: CabrioHatchback
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 2.0 Petrol1.6 Diesel
Petrol engines (BMW Z4) are generally quieter, smoother, and better suited for short trips due to quicker warm-up times. Diesel (Volkswagen Polo) engines, on the other hand, offer superior fuel efficiency and torque, making them ideal for long-distance driving and heavy loads. Read more: Petrol vs. Diesel: Fuel Economy and Key Differences.
Camshaft drive: Timing chainTiming belt
Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating.

Performance

Power: 197 HP75 HP
Torque: 320 NM195 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 6.8 seconds14 seconds
BMW Z4 is more dynamic to drive.
BMW Z4 engine produces 122 HP more power than Volkswagen Polo, whereas torque is 125 NM more than Volkswagen Polo. Thanks to more power BMW Z4 reaches 100 km/h speed 7.2 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): no data4.2
Fuel tank capacity: 52 litres45 litres
690 km with real consumption950 km with real consumption
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Drive type

Wheel drive type: Rear wheel drive (RWD)Front wheel drive (FWD)
Front-wheel drive cars (Volkswagen Polo) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (BMW Z4) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions.

Engines

Average engine lifespan: 320'000 km350'000 km
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used.
Engine production duration: 11 years6 years
Engine spread: Installed on at least 4 other car models, including BMW 3 sērija, BMW X3, BMW 4 sērija, BMW X4Used also on Skoda Fabia
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. BMW Z4 might be a better choice in this respect.
BMW Z4 2018 2.0 engine: Compared to their predecessors, B48 engines are more robust and less prone to major failures. They are well-suited for chip tuning, which can noticeably enhance performance and responsiveness without ...  More about BMW Z4 2018 2.0 engine 

Volkswagen Polo 2009 1.6 engine: The 1.6 TDI turbo diesel engine is generally reliable, which is especially reassuring given its frequent use in commercial vehicles. Even under heavy use, it can exceed 500,000 km, provided that maintenance is performed regularly and ...  More about Volkswagen Polo 2009 1.6 engine 

Dimensions

Length: 4.32 m3.97 m
Width: 1.86 m1.68 m
Height: 1.30 m1.49 m
BMW Z4 is larger, but lower.
BMW Z4 is 35 cm longer than the Volkswagen Polo, 18 cm wider, while the height of BMW Z4 is 18 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 281 litres280 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
no data952 litres
BMW Z4 has 1 litres more trunk space than the Volkswagen Polo.
Turning diameter: 11 metersno data
Gross weight (kg): 1`7251`650
Safety:
BMW Z4 scores higher in safety tests. The BMW Z4 scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests.
Quality: no data
average
Average price (€): 37 0003600
Pros and Cons: BMW Z4 has
  • timing chain engine
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • higher safety
  • better safety assist technologies
Volkswagen Polo has
  • timing belt engine
  • longer expected engine lifespan
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv