BMW Z4 2006 vs Mercedes CLK 2005
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 3.2 Petrol | 3.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 343 HP | 231 HP | |
Torque: | 365 NM | 300 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 5 seconds | 7.7 seconds | |
BMW Z4 is more dynamic to drive. BMW Z4 engine produces 112 HP more power than Mercedes CLK, whereas torque is 65 NM more than Mercedes CLK. Thanks to more power BMW Z4 reaches 100 km/h speed 2.7 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 12.2 | 9.5 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 11.8 l/100km | 9.5 l/100km | |
The Mercedes CLK is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification BMW Z4 consumes 2.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mercedes CLK, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the BMW Z4 could require 405 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, BMW Z4 consumes 2.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mercedes CLK. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 62 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 450 km in combined cycle | 650 km in combined cycle | |
460 km with real consumption | 650 km with real consumption | ||
Mercedes CLK gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.09 m | 4.65 m | |
Width: | 1.78 m | 1.74 m | |
Height: | 1.30 m | 1.42 m | |
BMW Z4 is 56 cm shorter than the Mercedes CLK, 4 cm wider, while the height of BMW Z4 is 12 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 200 litres | 276 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
220 litres | no data | |
Mercedes CLK has more luggage space. BMW Z4 has 76 litres less trunk space than the Mercedes CLK. | |||
Turning diameter: | no data | 10.8 meters | |
Gross weight (kg): | 1`705 | 2`035 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | above average | above average | |
Average price (€): | 10 400 | 8400 | |
Pros and Cons: |
BMW Z4 has
|
Mercedes CLK has
| |