BMW Z4 2005 vs Mazda MX-5 2009
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 160 HP | |
| Torque: | 200 NM | 188 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.2 seconds | 7.6 seconds | |
|
Mazda MX-5 is a more dynamic driving. BMW Z4 engine produces 10 HP less power than Mazda MX-5, but torque is 12 NM more than Mazda MX-5. Due to the lower power, BMW Z4 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.6 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.5 | 7.6 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.4 l/100km | 8.4 l/100km | |
|
The BMW Z4 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification BMW Z4 consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda MX-5, which means that by driving the BMW Z4 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 15 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, BMW Z4 consumes 1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda MX-5. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 730 km in combined cycle | 650 km in combined cycle | |
| 740 km with real consumption | 590 km with real consumption | ||
| BMW Z4 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 420'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 11 years | 13 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including BMW 3 sērija, BMW 1 sērija, BMW X3, BMW X1 | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Mazda 6, Mazda 3, Mazda 5, Mazda CX-5 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The BMW Z4 engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
| Mazda MX-5 2009 2.0 engine: The engine tends to idle unevenly. Engine problems may also include the thermostat and cooling pump. This engine tends to consume more oil at higher mileages. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.09 m | 4.02 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.72 m | |
| Height: | 1.30 m | 1.26 m | |
|
BMW Z4 is larger. BMW Z4 is 7 cm longer than the Mazda MX-5, 6 cm wider, while the height of BMW Z4 is 5 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 240 litres | 150 litres | |
|
BMW Z4 has more luggage capacity. BMW Z4 has 90 litres more trunk space than the Mazda MX-5. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.8 meters | 10 meters | |
| The turning circle of the BMW Z4 is 0.2 metres less than that of the Mazda MX-5. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`375 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | above average | |
| Mazda MX-5 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data BMW Z4 has serious deffects in 120 percent more cases than Mazda MX-5, so Mazda MX-5 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 8400 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
BMW Z4 has
|
Mazda MX-5 has
| |