BMW Z4 2006 vs Audi TT 2007
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.0 Petrol | 3.2 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 265 HP | 250 HP | |
| Torque: | 315 NM | 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6 seconds | 5.9 seconds | |
| BMW Z4 engine produces 15 HP more power than Audi TT, but torque is 5 NM less than Audi TT. Despite the higher power, BMW Z4 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.0 | 9.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 9.8 l/100km | 10.0 l/100km | |
|
The BMW Z4 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification BMW Z4 consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Audi TT, which means that by driving the BMW Z4 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 75 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, BMW Z4 consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Audi TT. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 610 km in combined cycle | 630 km in combined cycle | |
| 800 km on highway | 810 km on highway | ||
| 560 km with real consumption | 600 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| BMW Z4 2006 3.0 engine: The BMW N52 engine was the first water-cooled engine to feature a composite cylinder block made from a magnesium and aluminum alloy. It was included in Ward’s AutoWorld’s list of the top 10 engines in 2006 and 2007. While it offers many advantages, the ... More about BMW Z4 2006 3.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.09 m | 4.18 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.30 m | 1.36 m | |
|
BMW Z4 is smaller. BMW Z4 is 9 cm shorter than the Audi TT, 6 cm narrower, while the height of BMW Z4 is 6 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 240 litres | 250 litres | |
| BMW Z4 has 10 litres less trunk space than the Audi TT. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.8 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the BMW Z4 is 1.2 metres less than that of the Audi TT, which means BMW Z4 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`650 | 1`810 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | above average | high | |
| Audi TT has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data BMW Z4 has serious deffects in 190 percent more cases than Audi TT, so Audi TT quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 14 200 | 9800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
BMW Z4 has
|
Audi TT has
| |