BMW Z4 2006 vs Mercedes SLK 2005
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.0 Petrol | 3.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 265 HP | 231 HP | |
| Torque: | 315 NM | 300 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 5.7 seconds | 6.3 seconds | |
|
BMW Z4 is more dynamic to drive. BMW Z4 engine produces 34 HP more power than Mercedes SLK, whereas torque is 15 NM more than Mercedes SLK. Thanks to more power BMW Z4 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.6 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.6 | 9.7 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 9.4 l/100km | 10.5 l/100km | |
|
The BMW Z4 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification BMW Z4 consumes 1.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mercedes SLK, which means that by driving the BMW Z4 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 165 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, BMW Z4 consumes 1.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mercedes SLK. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 630 km in combined cycle | 720 km in combined cycle | |
| 580 km with real consumption | 660 km with real consumption | ||
| Mercedes SLK gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 380'000 km | 420'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 7 years | 13 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 8 other car models, including BMW 5 sērija, BMW 3 sērija, BMW X5, BMW 7 sērija, BMW 1 sērija | Installed on at least 6 other car models, including Mercedes C klase, Mercedes E klase, Mercedes CLK | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| BMW Z4 2006 3.0 engine: The BMW N52 engine was the first water-cooled engine to feature a composite cylinder block made from a magnesium and aluminum alloy. It was included in Ward’s AutoWorld’s list of the top 10 engines in 2006 and 2007. While it offers many advantages, the ... More about BMW Z4 2006 3.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.09 m | 4.09 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.79 m | |
| Height: | 1.30 m | 1.30 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. BMW Z4 and Mercedes SLK are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 240 litres | 208 litres | |
|
BMW Z4 has more luggage capacity. BMW Z4 has 32 litres more trunk space than the Mercedes SLK. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.8 meters | 10.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the BMW Z4 is 0.7 metres less than that of the Mercedes SLK, which means BMW Z4 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Power steering: | Electric power steering | Hydraulic power steering | |
| Electric power steering is simpler, quieter, more fuel-efficient, more configurable and provides additional features such as auto-steering for lane assist and parking. The disadvantages of electric power steering are possible overheating under prolonged load conditions and insufficient feedback (feeling) during steering. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`650 | 1`755 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | above average | high | |
| Mercedes SLK has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data BMW Z4 has serious deffects in 30 percent more cases than Mercedes SLK, so Mercedes SLK quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 14 200 | 7200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
BMW Z4 has
|
Mercedes SLK has
| |