BMW Z4 2010 vs Mercedes SLK 2011
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.0 Petrol | 3.5 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 340 HP | 306 HP | |
| Torque: | 450 NM | 370 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 4.8 seconds | 5.6 seconds | |
|
BMW Z4 is more dynamic to drive. BMW Z4 engine produces 34 HP more power than Mercedes SLK, whereas torque is 80 NM more than Mercedes SLK. Thanks to more power BMW Z4 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.8 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.0 | 7.1 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 12.1 l/100km | 9.6 l/100km | |
|
The Mercedes SLK is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification BMW Z4 consumes 1.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mercedes SLK, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the BMW Z4 could require 285 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, BMW Z4 consumes 2.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mercedes SLK. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 610 km in combined cycle | 840 km in combined cycle | |
| 790 km on highway | 1090 km on highway | ||
| 450 km with real consumption | 620 km with real consumption | ||
| Mercedes SLK gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 300'000 km | 420'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Mercedes SLK engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 10 years | 15 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on BMW 7 sērija | Installed on at least 6 other car models, including Mercedes C klase, Mercedes E klase, Mercedes ML, Mercedes CLS | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mercedes SLK might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.24 m | 4.14 m | |
| Width: | 1.79 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.29 m | 1.30 m | |
| BMW Z4 is 10 cm longer than the Mercedes SLK, 2 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 180 litres | 224 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 335 litres | |
|
Mercedes SLK has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, BMW Z4 has 44 litres less trunk space than the Mercedes SLK. This could mean that the BMW Z4 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 10.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the BMW Z4 is 0.2 metres more than that of the Mercedes SLK. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`855 | 1`855 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | high | high | |
| Mercedes SLK has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data BMW Z4 has serious deffects in 60 percent more cases than Mercedes SLK, so Mercedes SLK quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 18 600 | 19 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
BMW Z4 has
|
Mercedes SLK has
| |