BMW Z4 2009 vs Audi TT 2010
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.0 Petrol | 2.5 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 258 HP | 360 HP | |
| Torque: | 310 NM | 465 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 5.8 seconds | 4.7 seconds | |
|
Audi TT is a more dynamic driving. BMW Z4 engine produces 102 HP less power than Audi TT, whereas torque is 155 NM less than Audi TT. Due to the lower power, BMW Z4 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.5 | 9.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 9.6 l/100km | 9.2 l/100km | |
|
By specification BMW Z4 consumes 1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Audi TT, which means that by driving the BMW Z4 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 150 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, BMW Z4 consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Audi TT. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 640 km in combined cycle | 630 km in combined cycle | |
| 880 km on highway | 830 km on highway | ||
| 570 km with real consumption | 650 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| BMW Z4 2009 3.0 engine: The BMW N52 engine was the first water-cooled engine to feature a composite cylinder block made from a magnesium and aluminum alloy. It was included in Ward’s AutoWorld’s list of the top 10 engines in 2006 and 2007. While it offers many advantages, the ... More about BMW Z4 2009 3.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.24 m | 4.20 m | |
| Width: | 1.79 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.29 m | 1.35 m | |
| BMW Z4 is 4 cm longer than the Audi TT, 5 cm narrower, while the height of BMW Z4 is 6 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 180 litres | 250 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
310 litres | no data | |
|
Audi TT has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, BMW Z4 has 70 litres less trunk space than the Audi TT. This could mean that the BMW Z4 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 10.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the BMW Z4 is 0.2 metres less than that of the Audi TT. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`745 | 1`830 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | high | high | |
| Audi TT has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for BMW Z4, so Audi TT quality could be a bit better. | |||
| Average price (€): | 18 600 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Audi TT has
| |