BMW Z4 2003 vs Chrysler Crossfire 2004
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 2.0 - 3.0 | 3.2 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 - 231 HP | 218 - 335 HP | |
| Torque: | 200 - 300 NM | 310 - 420 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 5.9 - 8.3 seconds | 5.3 - 6.5 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.5 - 9.5 | 10.1 - 11.0 | |
|
BMW Z4 petrol engines consumes on average 1.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than Chrysler Crossfire. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.09 m | 4.06 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.77 m | |
| Height: | 1.30 m | 1.32 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. BMW Z4 is 3 cm longer than the Chrysler Crossfire, 1 cm wider, while the height of BMW Z4 is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 300 litres | 105 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
260 litres | 190 litres | |
|
BMW Z4 has more luggage capacity. BMW Z4 has 195 litres more trunk space than the Chrysler Crossfire. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in BMW Z4 (by 70 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.8 meters | 10.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the BMW Z4 is 0.5 metres less than that of the Chrysler Crossfire, which means BMW Z4 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`567 | ~ 1`695 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 8400 | 8000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
BMW Z4 has
|
Chrysler Crossfire has
| |