BMW Z4 2003 vs Audi TT 1999

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
BMW Z4
2003 - 2006
Audi TT
1999 - 2006
Gearbox: Manual/AutomaticManual/Automatic
Wheel drive type: Rear wheel drive (RWD)Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)
BMW Z4 is available only with rear wheel drive, while Audi TT can be equipped with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive.
Engines: 2.0 - 3.01.8 - 3.2

Performance

Power: 150 - 231 HP150 - 250 HP
Torque: 200 - 300 NM210 - 320 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 5.9 - 8.3 seconds6.4 - 8.9 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 7.5 - 9.58.2 - 11.0
BMW Z4 petrol engines consumes on average 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than Audi TT.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!

Dimensions

Length: 4.09 m4.04 m
Width: 1.78 m1.76 m
Height: 1.30 m1.35 m
BMW Z4 is larger, but lower.
BMW Z4 is 5 cm longer than the Audi TT, 2 cm wider, while the height of BMW Z4 is 5 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 300 litres220 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
260 litresno data
BMW Z4 has more luggage capacity.
BMW Z4 has 80 litres more trunk space than the Audi TT.
Turning diameter: 9.8 meters10 meters
The turning circle of the BMW Z4 is 0.2 metres less than that of the Audi TT.
Gross weight (kg): ~ 1`567~ 1`737
Safety:
Quality:
average

above average
Average price (€): 86005200
Pros and Cons: BMW Z4 has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • roomier boot
Audi TT has
  • available with 4x4 drive
  • fewer faults
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv