BMW Z4 2013 vs Jaguar F-Type 2013
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| BMW Z4 is available only with rear wheel drive, while Jaguar F-Type can be equipped with rear wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. | |||
| Engines: | 2.0 - 3.0 | 3.0 - 5.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 156 - 306 HP | 340 - 575 HP | |
| Torque: | 270 - 400 NM | 450 - 700 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 5.1 - 8.1 seconds | 3.7 - 5.7 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.8 - 9.4 | 8.1 - 11.3 | |
|
BMW Z4 petrol engines consumes on average 2.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than Jaguar F-Type. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.24 m | 4.47 m | |
| Width: | 1.79 m | 1.92 m | |
| Height: | 1.29 m | 1.31 m | |
|
BMW Z4 is smaller. BMW Z4 is 23 cm shorter than the Jaguar F-Type, 13 cm narrower, while the height of BMW Z4 is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 180 litres | 196 litres | |
| BMW Z4 has 16 litres less trunk space than the Jaguar F-Type. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 11.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the BMW Z4 is 0.6 metres less than that of the Jaguar F-Type, which means BMW Z4 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`765 | ~ 2`064 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | high | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 23 000 | 35 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
BMW Z4 has
|
Jaguar F-Type has
| |