BMW Z4 2006 vs Audi TT 2006

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
BMW Z4
2006 - 2009
Audi TT
2006 - 2010
Gearbox: Manual/AutomaticManual/Automatic
Wheel drive type: Rear wheel drive (RWD)Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)
BMW Z4 is available only with rear wheel drive, while Audi TT can be equipped with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive.
Engines: 3.0 - 3.2 (petrol)1.8 - 3.2 (petrol, diesel)

Performance

Power: 265 - 343 HP160 - 340 HP
Torque: 315 - 365 NM250 - 450 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 5 - 6 seconds4.6 - 7.5 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 8.6 - 12.15.3 - 10.3
BMW Z4 petrol engines consumes on average 2.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than Audi TT.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!

Dimensions

Length: 4.10 m4.19 m
Width: 1.78 m1.84 m
Height: 1.28 m1.35 m
BMW Z4 is smaller.
BMW Z4 is 9 cm shorter than the Audi TT, 6 cm narrower, while the height of BMW Z4 is 7 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 285 litres290 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
340 litresno data
BMW Z4 has 5 litres less trunk space than the Audi TT.
Turning diameter: 10.5 meters11 meters
The turning circle of the BMW Z4 is 0.5 metres less than that of the Audi TT, which means BMW Z4 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): ~ 1`690~ 1`763
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
average

high
Average price (€): 14 4008400
Pros and Cons: BMW Z4 has
  • only petrol engines available
Audi TT has
  • available with 4x4 drive
  • petrol and diesel engines available
  • lower fuel consumption for petrol engines
  • fewer faults
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv