BMW Z3 2000 vs Audi TT 2003
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 3.0 Petrol | 3.2 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 231 HP | 250 HP | |
Torque: | 300 NM | 320 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.3 seconds | 6.4 seconds | |
BMW Z3 engine produces 19 HP less power than Audi TT, whereas torque is 20 NM less than Audi TT. Despite less power, BMW Z3 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.1 | 9.9 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 11.3 l/100km | 9.8 l/100km | |
The Audi TT is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification BMW Z3 consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Audi TT, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the BMW Z3 could require 30 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, BMW Z3 consumes 1.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Audi TT. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 51 litres | 62 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 500 km in combined cycle | 620 km in combined cycle | |
670 km on highway | 800 km on highway | ||
450 km with real consumption | 630 km with real consumption | ||
Audi TT gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.05 m | 4.04 m | |
Width: | 1.74 m | 1.76 m | |
Height: | 1.29 m | 1.35 m | |
BMW Z3 is 1 cm longer than the Audi TT, 2 cm narrower, while the height of BMW Z3 is 6 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | no data | 180 litres | |
Turning diameter: | 10 meters | 10 meters | |
Gross weight (kg): | 1`500 | 1`890 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | high | high | |
Audi TT has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for BMW Z3, so Audi TT quality could be a bit better. | |||
Average price (€): | 7600 | 5200 | |
Pros and Cons: |
|
Audi TT has
| |