BMW Z3 2000 vs BMW Z3 2000
Body: | Cabrio | Coupe | |
---|---|---|---|
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
Engine: | 3.0 Petrol | 3.0 Petrol | |
Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 231 HP | 231 HP | |
Torque: | 300 NM | 300 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6 seconds | 6 seconds | |
BMW Z3 2000 and BMW Z3 2000 have the same engine power, the torque is the same for both cars. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.5 | 9.5 | |
Fuel tank capacity: | 51 litres | 51 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 530 km in combined cycle | 530 km in combined cycle | |
690 km on highway | 690 km on highway | ||
520 km with real consumption | 520 km with real consumption | ||
Engines | |||
Average engine lifespan: | 460'000 km | 460'000 km | |
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
Engine production duration: | 7 years | 7 years | |
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.05 m | 4.02 m | |
Width: | 1.74 m | 1.74 m | |
Height: | 1.29 m | 1.31 m | |
Both cars are similar in size. BMW Z3 2000 is 3 cm longer than the BMW Z3 2000, width is practically the same , while the height of BMW Z3 2000 is 2 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 165 litres | 210 litres | |
BMW Z3 2000 has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, BMW Z3 2000 has 45 litres less trunk space than the BMW Z3 2000. This could mean that the BMW Z3 2000 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
Turning diameter: | 10 meters | 10 meters | |
Gross weight (kg): | 1`575 | 1`575 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | high | high | |
Average price (€): | 7600 | 11 600 | |
Pros and Cons: |
BMW Z3 has
|
BMW Z3 has
| |