BMW Z3 1996 vs Honda S2000 1999
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.9 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 140 HP | 240 HP | |
| Torque: | 180 NM | 208 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.5 seconds | 6.2 seconds | |
|
Honda S2000 is a more dynamic driving. BMW Z3 engine produces 100 HP less power than Honda S2000, whereas torque is 28 NM less than Honda S2000. Due to the lower power, BMW Z3 reaches 100 km/h speed 3.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.0 | 9.9 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.2 l/100km | 10.1 l/100km | |
|
The BMW Z3 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification BMW Z3 consumes 1.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Honda S2000, which means that by driving the BMW Z3 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 285 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, BMW Z3 consumes 1.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Honda S2000. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 51 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 630 km in combined cycle | 500 km in combined cycle | |
| 850 km on highway | 630 km on highway | ||
| 620 km with real consumption | 490 km with real consumption | ||
| BMW Z3 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.02 m | 4.14 m | |
| Width: | 1.69 m | 1.75 m | |
| Height: | 1.29 m | 1.28 m | |
|
BMW Z3 is smaller, but slightly higher. BMW Z3 is 12 cm shorter than the Honda S2000, 6 cm narrower, while the height of BMW Z3 is 1 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 165 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the BMW Z3 is 0.8 metres less than that of the Honda S2000, which means BMW Z3 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`435 | 1`220 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 7600 | 23 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
BMW Z3 has
|
Honda S2000 has
| |